My vote for Ileana

The Venezuelan news media has played up critical remarks about President Hugo Chavez and his narco-gangster revolution that were made yesterday in Washington, D.C. by US Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL).

The Bolivarian misogynist-in-chief may (or not) choose to hurl back some insults and threats.

But let’s not jump the gun.

Representative Ros-Lehtinen has not actually been elected chairwoman of the House Committee on International Relations yet.

Moreover, Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) is more senior than Ms. Ros-Lehtinen. I’m told that Smith hankers for the chairmanship.

But if I could vote, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen would be my first choice to chair the committee.

Rep. Smith is very strong on issues like human rights, pro-life and Haiti.

But Ms. Ros-Lehtinen is much stronger on hemispheric security issues, particularly relating to Venezuela, Cuba, Colombia and, increasingly, Mexico – because much of what’s happening today in Mexico can be traced directly to the Chavez/Castro/FARC narco-alliance.

Assuming that Ms. Ros-Lehtinen is elected to the committee chairmanship that she has been working to achieve for 21 years, what might we expect, substantively?

1)More hearings on the multi-layered narco-terrorist links between the Chavez regime, the Castros, the FARC and ELN, ETA and Islamist terrorist groups.

2)More official reports and studies on the above issues by entities like the Congressional Research service.

3)More pressure on the Obama administration’s top Latin Americanists – chiefly Dan Restrepo at the White House and Arturo Valenzuela at the State Department – to produce for Congress whatever intelligence the current US administration possesses about the Chavez regime’s criminal enterprises.

Hint: The US administration has mountains of evidence against Chavez and his narco-gangster generals, but Restrepo particularly has worked tirelessly to keep this damning intelligence out of the public domain.

Certainly, there will be resistance from the executive branch if Ms. Ros-Lehtinen exercises her constitutional oversight authority to find out what the Obama administration knows about Chavez, and how long it has known..

But Restrepo and his White House bosses won’t willingly reveal that the chief reason that the Obama administration has been AWOL on Venezuela is that Restrepo has done everything in his power to keep a lid on the Bolivarian Pandora’s Box.

Valenzuela, by temperament a conciliator and negotiator, will walk a fine mid-line in his public dealings with the Republican-controlled International Relations Committee.

But getting real facts out of Valenzuela in open committee hearings will be analogous to extracting wisdom teeth through the rectum.

Valenzuela can be expected to seek closed hearings because he doesn’t want to make political waves for himself if he embarrasses any higher-ups in the Obama administration by revealing that the current administration really doesn’t have any policy or strategy for managing/containing Chavez.

4)There is a strong probability that Ms. Ros-Lehtinen could sponsor bills that aim to apply the recently toughened Iran Sanctions Act against the Chavez regime.

However, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen should abandon the naïve notion that other Latin American democracies will join a US-led initiative to build a geopolitical corral around Chavez and his gangsters. The previous US administration tried to do this and failed miserably.

Colombia is an unconditional ally of the US – up to a point. President Juan Manuel Santos will do everything he can to further strengthen Colombia’s good relations with the US.

But Santos will conduct an independent foreign policy when it comes to dealing with the Chavez regime next door.

Santos won’t hitch Colombia’s foreign policy wagon to Washington because, let’s face it, the Gringos have shown repeatedly that they are not completely reliable allies of Colombia.

The US always will place its strategic interests ahead of Colombia’s when it comes to dealing with Chavez, as it should rightly do.

The region’s other democracies won’t play US hardball against Venezuela because they have nothing to gain and much to lose by picking a public fight with the Chavez regime.

Fighting publicly with Chavez is like engaging in a pissing contest with a rabid skunk. The winners surely will wind up stinking as badly as the skunk.

Besides, in these times it’s considered bad form in Latin America, even among the staunchest democracies, to play openly on the US team.

Their view is that the persistent problems between the US and Chavez are none of the region’s business.

There’s also the issue of ‘cuanto hay pa’ mi.”

Basically, what do the region’s democracies stand to gain by climbing aboard an anti-Chavez wagon owned and steered by the US?

In a word, “nada.”

The reality might be different if the US government had a credible reputation of keeping its economic and other pledges to Latin America.

But facts are facts.

The US doesn’t keep its promises to Latin America and doesn’t fulfill its rhetorical commitments to the region.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me a hundred times, shame on me.

That said, I’d love to see Ms. Ros-Lehtinen elected chairwoman of the International Relations Committee, which is long overdue for a chairperson who knows the region extraordinarily well and who has the “cojones” to challenge thugs like Chavez.

About Caracas Gringo

Representing less than 0.00000000001515152% of the world population as of 31 December 2011.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to My vote for Ileana

  1. Roberto N says:

    So what reason does Restrepo have for keeping the lid on things?

    Bomberos no se pisan la manguera entre si?

    Like

  2. Very well said. I would vote for her too, since she is more receptive to on line opinions like ours when we address her on those issues pertaining to foreign policy south of the border.I´m sure she pulls “Obama´s ears” on Venezuela, but then again Obama may be “mule headed” and wont take advice from anyone in regards to the Chavbez regime, though there are tons of evidence of what many of us denounce on Chavez.

    Like

  3. Lucia says:

    From Goldblog at the Atlantic Monthly:
    “Ostensibly pro-Israel Republicans who, in their desire to defeat the Democrats on every front, actually wind up hurting Israel. The Netanyahu government understood very well that Fidel Castro’s condemnation of Iranian anti-Semitism, and his forceful statement endorsing Israel’s right-to-exist, were of great strategic value, especially as the global left lines up in support of a boycott-Israel movement. But Israel’s great friend, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, the incoming chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, knew better.”
    Just sharing.

    Like

  4. CuervoBlanco says:

    And she, was elected. Goodluck Ileana.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s